Hernández-García, MartaMolina-Barceló, AnaVanaclocha-Espi, MercedesZurriaga, OscarPérez-Gómez, BeatrizAragonés, NúriaAmiano, PilarAltzibar, Jone MirenCastaño Vinyals, GemmaSala, MariaEderra, MaríaMartín, VicenteGómez-Acebo, InésVidal, CarmenTardón, AdoninaMarcos-Gragera, RafaelPollán, MarinaKogevinas, ManolisSalas, Dolores2022-04-292022-04-292022Hernández-García M, Molina-Barceló A, Vanaclocha-Espi M, Zurriaga Ó, Pérez-Gómez B, Aragonés N, Amiano P, Altzibar JM, Castaño-Vinyals G, Sala M, Ederra M, Martín V, Gómez-Acebo I, Vidal C, Tardón A, Marcos-Gragera R, Pollán M, Kogevinas M, Salas D. Differences in breast cancer-risk factors between screen-detected and non-screen-detected cases (MCC-Spain study). Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Jan;33(1):125-36. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01511-40957-5243http://hdl.handle.net/10230/52938Purpose: The variation in breast cancer (BC)-risk factor associations between screen-detected (SD) and non-screen-detected (NSD) tumors has been poorly studied, despite the interest of this aspect in risk assessment and prevention. This study analyzes the differences in breast cancer-risk factor associations according to detection method and tumor phenotype in Spanish women aged between 50 and 69. Methods: We examined 900 BC cases and 896 controls aged between 50 and 69, recruited in the multicase-control MCC-Spain study. With regard to the cases, 460 were detected by screening mammography, whereas 144 were diagnosed by other means. By tumor phenotype, 591 were HR+, 153 were HER2+, and 58 were TN. Lifestyle, reproductive factors, family history of BC, and tumor characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to compare cases vs. controls and SD vs. NSD cases. Multinomial regression models (controls used as a reference) were adjusted for case analysis according to phenotype and detection method. Results: TN was associated with a lower risk of SD BC (OR 0.30 IC 0.10-0.89), as were intermediate (OR 0.18 IC 0.07-0.44) and advanced stages at diagnosis (OR 0.11 IC 0.03-0.34). Nulliparity in postmenopausal women and age at menopause were related to an increased risk of SD BC (OR 1.60 IC 1.08-2.36; OR 1.48 IC 1.09-2.00, respectively). Nulliparity in postmenopausal women was associated with a higher risk of HR+ (OR 1.66 IC 1.15-2.40). Age at menopause was related to a greater risk of HR+ (OR 1.60 IC 1.22-2.11) and HER2+ (OR 1.59 IC 1.03-2.45) tumors. Conclusion: Reproductive risk factors are associated with SD BC, as are HR+ tumors. Differences in BC-risk factor associations according to detection method may be related to prevailing phenotypes among categories.application/pdfeng© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Differences in breast cancer-risk factors between screen-detected and non-screen-detected cases (MCC-Spain study)info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01511-4Breast neoplasmEarly detection of cancerPhenotypeRisk factorsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess