Moreso, Josep Joan2024-03-262024-03-262017Moreso JJ. On Deontic Truth and Values. Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía. 2017 Oct 31;49(146):61-74. DOI: 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.1811870-4905http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59575This article analyzes the thesis of ethical relativism, as defended byAlchourrón and Bulygin (1983). These authors offer, on the one hand, a suggestiveconception according to which the question “what are our obligations?” is equivalentto thinking about what is to be done; on the other hand, they defend a relativistconception of ethics. They present three objections to constructivist accounts ofethics that are not relativist: a) the argument of the burden of theproof; b) aversion of the dilemma of Euthyphro, and c) the argument of particularism. Thisarticle presents counterarguments to these objections in the attempt to show thatthey are not conclusive and that a space therefore remains for objectivity in thenormative sphere.application/pdfengCrítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.On deontic truth and valuesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.181Alchourrón-bulyginEthical relativismEthical constructivismBurdenof proofParticularisminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess