Wang, XinghuaNavarro-Martinez, Daniel2024-02-232024-02-232023Wang X, Navarro-Martinez D. Increasing the external validity of social preference games by reducing measurement error. Games Econ Behav. 2023;141:261-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.0060899-8256http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59229An increasing number of studies call into question the external validity of social preference games. In this paper, we show that these games have a low correlation with single pro-social behaviors in the field, but this correlation can be substantially increased by aggregating behaviors to reduce measurement error. We tracked people's daily pro-social behaviors for 14 days using a day reconstruction method; the same people played three different social preference games on seven different occasions. We show that, as more pro-social behaviors and game rounds are aggregated, the games become much better predictors of pro-sociality. This predictive power is further increased by using statistical methods designed to better account for measurement error. These findings suggest that social preference games capture important underlying dispositions of real-world pro-sociality, and they can be successfully used to predict aggregated pro-social inclinations. This has crucial implications for the external validity and applicability of economic games.application/pdfeng© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.006Social preference gamesExternal validityField behaviorMeasurement errorAggregationDay reconstruction methodinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess