Verdejo Aparicio, Víctor Martín2024-03-152024-03-152020Verdejo VM. Explaining public action. Topoi. 2020;39:475-85. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-017-9524-20167-7411http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59419Actions are uncontroversially public. However, the prevailing model of explanation in the debate about the de se seems to conflict with this fact by proposing agent-specific explanations that yield agent-specific types of action—i.e. types of action that no two agents can instantiate. Remarkably, this point affects both proponents and critics of the de se. In this paper, I present this kind of problem, characterise the proper level of analysis for action explanation compatible with the publicity of action—i.e. the agent-bound level—and suggest that acknowledgement of this level highlights two important amendments of contemporary views. First, sceptics must accept that, when explanation is attitude-involving, the attitudes mentioned in the explanation of action must refer to the agent. Secondly, and perhaps more surprisingly, proponents of the de se should seek for accounts of de se attitudes that are not confined to a specific agent and are, therefore, sharable across agents.application/pdfengThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9524-2info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9524-2De se attitudeAction explanationAction typePublic actionAgent-bound levelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess