Hobolt, Sara B.Hoerner, Julian M.Rodon i Casarramona, Antoni2024-04-082024-04-082021Hobolt SB, Hoerner JM, Rodon T. Having a say or getting your way? Political choice and satisfaction with democracy. Eur J Polit Res. 2021 Nov;60(4):854-73. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.124290304-4130http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59682Supplementary materials files: online appendix; replication data.Citizen satisfaction with democracy is greater when parties offer choices that are congruent with voterpreferences. But are citizens content with simply having a party that represents their views or does their satisfactiondepend on whether that party can also be instrumental in implementing policies? We argue that instrumentalitymoderates the effect of ideological congruence on democratic satisfaction. Combining an analysis of cross-nationalsurvey data with an experimental conjoint design, we find that citizens able to vote for a congruent party with achance of entering government are more satisfied with democracy, whereas congruence without instrumentality hasno such effect.application/pdfengThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Hobolt SB, Hoerner JM, Rodon T. Having a say or getting your way? Political choice and satisfaction with democracy. Eur J Polit Res. 2021 Nov;60(4):854-73, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12429. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.Having a say or getting your way? Political choice and satisfaction with democracyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12429Political choiceSatisfaction with democracyCongruenceInstrumentalityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess