Parliamentary acceptability of EU military deployments in member states: beyond rubber-stamping?

Kissack, Robert; Michaels, Eva; Fernández, Óscar

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2416685

Parliamentary acceptability of EU military deployments in member states: beyond rubber-stamping?

License

Citation

Kissack R, Michaels E, Fernández Ó. Parliamentary acceptability of EU military deployments in member states: beyond rubber-stamping? J Eur Integr. 2025;47(5):725-52. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2416685

Abstract

This article examines national parliamentary debates in 13 EU member states of eight CSDP military deployments underway between 2016 and 2021. It reviews discussions about whether, and why, to send troops on EU missions and operations, and the extent to which these debates differ from expectations in the literature derived from involvement in NATO operations. The survey includes small states, which have been previously excluded from such analysis. Drawing on a dataset of 411 statements by national parliamentarians from across Europe, the article employs eight discursive frames to understand how MPs articulate their acceptance (or not) of CSDP deployments. We supplement this with detailed data on national troop contributions. We find that CSDP debates in national parliaments resemble those of 'high-salience' deployments when considering frame usage and party position. We present limited evidence supporting the claim that small states frame deployment debates similarly to large states.