This paper analyzes the formation of Research Corporations as an
alternative governance structure for performing R&D compared to
pursuing in-house R&D projects. Research Corporations are private
for-profit research centers that bring together several firms
with similar research goals. In a Research Corporation formal
authority over the choice of projects is jointly exercised by the
top management of the member firms. A private for-profit
organization cannot commit not to interfere ...
This paper analyzes the formation of Research Corporations as an
alternative governance structure for performing R&D compared to
pursuing in-house R&D projects. Research Corporations are private
for-profit research centers that bring together several firms
with similar research goals. In a Research Corporation formal
authority over the choice of projects is jointly exercised by the
top management of the member firms. A private for-profit
organization cannot commit not to interfere with the project
choice of the researchers. However, increasing the number of
member firms of the Research Corporation reduces the incentive of
member firms to meddle with the research projects of researchers
because exercising formal authority over the choice of research
projects is a public good. The Research Corporation thus offers
researchers greater autonomy than a single firm pursuing an
identical research program in its in-house R&D department. This
attracts higher ability researchers to the Research Corporation
compared to the internal R&D department. The paper uses the
theoretical model to analyze the organization of the
Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC). The
facts of this case confirm the existence of a tension between
control over the choice of research projects and the ability of
researchers that the organization is able to attract or hold onto.
+