dc.contributor.author |
Cléro, Enora |
dc.contributor.author |
Demoury, Claire |
dc.contributor.author |
Grosche, Bernd |
dc.contributor.author |
Liutsko, Liudmila |
dc.contributor.author |
Motreff, Yvon |
dc.contributor.author |
Ohba, Takashi |
dc.contributor.author |
Oughton, Deborah |
dc.contributor.author |
Pirard, Philippe |
dc.contributor.author |
Rogel, Agnès |
dc.contributor.author |
Schneider, Thierry |
dc.contributor.author |
Van Nieuwenhuyse, An |
dc.contributor.author |
Laurier, Dominique |
dc.contributor.author |
Cardis, Elisabeth |
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-06-19T05:57:59Z |
dc.date.available |
2023-06-19T05:57:59Z |
dc.date.issued |
2023 |
dc.identifier.citation |
Cléro E, Demoury C, Grosche B, Liutsko L, Motreff Y, Ohba T, et al. Response to Tsuda et al. “demonstrating the undermining of science and health policy after the Fukushima nuclear accident by applying the toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods”. Environ Health. 2023 Feb 17;22(1):17. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-023-00966-z |
dc.identifier.issn |
1476-069X |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/57211 |
dc.description.abstract |
The SHAMISEN (Nuclear Emergency Situations - Improvement of Medical And Health Surveillance) European project was conducted in 2015-2017 to review the lessons learned from the experience of past nuclear accidents and develop recommendations for preparedness and health surveillance of populations affected by a nuclear accident. Using a toolkit approach, Tsuda et al. recently published a critical review of the article by Cléro et al. derived from the SHAMISEN project on thyroid cancer screening after nuclear accident. We address the main points of criticism of our publication on the SHAMISEN European project. We disagree with some of the arguments and criticisms mentioned by Tsuda et al. We continue to support the conclusions and recommendations of the SHAMISEN consortium, including the recommendation not to launch a mass thyroid cancer screening after a nuclear accident, but rather to make it available (with appropriate information counselling) to those who request it. |
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
dc.publisher |
BioMed Central |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Environmental Health. 2023 Feb 17;22(1):17 |
dc.rights |
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unle |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ |
dc.title |
Response to Tsuda et al. “demonstrating the undermining of science and health policy after the Fukushima nuclear accident by applying the toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods” |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-00966-z |
dc.subject.keyword |
Epidemiological methods |
dc.subject.keyword |
Thyroid cancer |
dc.subject.keyword |
Screening |
dc.subject.keyword |
Overdiagnosis |
dc.subject.keyword |
Nuclear accident |
dc.rights.accessRights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.type.version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |