The debate over the relation between grammatically relevant (specifically, what we term event referential) and idiosyncratic aspects of verb meaning
has produced a considerable literature. Some authors, such as Levin and Rappaport Hovav, have appealed to figurative uses of verbs as a source of data when
the analysis of their literal uses has been controversial, a move that has sometimes been criticized. However, the question of whether figurative uses of verbs
preserve the event referential properties ...
The debate over the relation between grammatically relevant (specifically, what we term event referential) and idiosyncratic aspects of verb meaning
has produced a considerable literature. Some authors, such as Levin and Rappaport Hovav, have appealed to figurative uses of verbs as a source of data when
the analysis of their literal uses has been controversial, a move that has sometimes been criticized. However, the question of whether figurative uses of verbs
preserve the event referential properties of their literal counterparts and are
therefore a valid source of data has not, to our knowledge, been systematically
explored. We offer two detailed cross-linguistic case studies of Spanish and
English verbs to provide an argument that figurative verb uses indeed are a
reliable source of evidence for identifying event referential components of
meaning: In each case study we find clear evidence for the preservation of these
components across uses, indicating that these aspects of meaning both constrain
and facilitate figurative uses of verbs.
+