During the COVID-19 pandemic, information is being rapidly shared by public health
experts and researchers through social media platforms. Whilst government policies were
disseminated and discussed, fake news and misinformation simultaneously created a
corresponding wave of “infodemics.” This study analyzed the discourse on Twitter in
several languages, investigating the reactions to government and public health agency
social media accounts that share policy decisions and official messages. ...
During the COVID-19 pandemic, information is being rapidly shared by public health
experts and researchers through social media platforms. Whilst government policies were
disseminated and discussed, fake news and misinformation simultaneously created a
corresponding wave of “infodemics.” This study analyzed the discourse on Twitter in
several languages, investigating the reactions to government and public health agency
social media accounts that share policy decisions and official messages. The study
collected messages from 21 official Twitter accounts of governments and public health
authorities in the UK, US, Mexico, Canada, Brazil, Spain, and Nigeria, from 15 March to
29 May 2020. Over 2 million tweets in various languages were analyzed using a mixedmethods approach to understand the messages both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Using automatic, text-based clustering, five topics were identified for each account
and then categorized into 10 emerging themes. Identified themes include political,
socio-economic, and population-protection issues, encompassing global, national, and
individual levels. A comparison was performed amongst the seven countries analyzed
and the United Kingdom (Scotland, Northern Ireland, and England) to find similarities
and differences between countries and government agencies. Despite the difference
in language, country of origin, epidemiological contexts within the countries, significant
similarities emerged. Our results suggest that other than general announcement and
reportage messages, the most-discussed topic is evidence-based leadership and
policymaking, followed by how to manage socio-economic consequences.
+