dc.contributor.author |
Criado, Roberta Fachini Jardim |
dc.contributor.author |
Criado, Paulo Ricardo |
dc.contributor.author |
Baldavira, Nathalia |
dc.contributor.author |
Cardial, Débora |
dc.contributor.author |
Giménez Arnau, Anna Maria |
dc.contributor.author |
Machado Filho, Carlos D'Apparecida |
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-08-30T06:47:59Z |
dc.date.available |
2021-08-30T06:47:59Z |
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
dc.identifier.citation |
Criado RFJ, Criado PR, Baldavira N, Cardial D, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Machado Filho CD. What lessons can we learn? Clinical and epidemiological retrospective analysis of 267 patients with urticaria in a Brazilian tertiary center. An Bras Dermatol. 2021;96(4):436-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.003 |
dc.identifier.issn |
0365-0596 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/48343 |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: There are few epidemiological studies of urticaria, published in the indexed literature (PubMed/Medline). Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical data among patients with urticaria/angioedema attending a reference clinic in Brazil. Methods: Two hundred sixty-seven patients were evaluated retrospectively considering demographic data, time course of the disease, triggering symptoms, the presence of angioedema, complementary laboratory tests including total blood count, reactive-C protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, IgE serum levels, and other, as necessary. Results: The most commonly diagnosed type of urticaria was chronic spontaneous urticaria (56.93%). Angioedema was associated with chronic urticaria in 108 patients (40.08%). Study limitations: Unicentered and retrospective. Conclusion: Some relevant findings in this study are the observation of a female prevalence of cases (4-females: 1-man), a result more elevated than demonstrated in previous studies in Europe and Asia, the median age was 43-years old and the delay of time between the diagnosis of urticaria and the admission for treatment in a specialized center was approximately 2-years. Other multicenter studies can better establish these differences in Brazilian patients. |
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
dc.relation.ispartof |
An Bras Dermatol. 2021;96(4):436-41 |
dc.rights |
© 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
dc.title |
What lessons can we learn? Clinical and epidemiological retrospective analysis of 267 patients with urticaria in a Brazilian tertiary center |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.003 |
dc.subject.keyword |
Angioedema |
dc.subject.keyword |
Biomarkers, pharmacological |
dc.subject.keyword |
Epidemiology |
dc.subject.keyword |
Treatment outcome |
dc.subject.keyword |
Urticaria |
dc.rights.accessRights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.type.version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |