Welcome to the UPF Digital Repository

What lessons can we learn? Clinical and epidemiological retrospective analysis of 267 patients with urticaria in a Brazilian tertiary center

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Criado, Roberta Fachini Jardim
dc.contributor.author Criado, Paulo Ricardo
dc.contributor.author Baldavira, Nathalia
dc.contributor.author Cardial, Débora
dc.contributor.author Giménez Arnau, Anna Maria
dc.contributor.author Machado Filho, Carlos D'Apparecida
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-30T06:47:59Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-30T06:47:59Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Criado RFJ, Criado PR, Baldavira N, Cardial D, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Machado Filho CD. What lessons can we learn? Clinical and epidemiological retrospective analysis of 267 patients with urticaria in a Brazilian tertiary center. An Bras Dermatol. 2021;96(4):436-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.003
dc.identifier.issn 0365-0596
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/48343
dc.description.abstract Background: There are few epidemiological studies of urticaria, published in the indexed literature (PubMed/Medline). Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical data among patients with urticaria/angioedema attending a reference clinic in Brazil. Methods: Two hundred sixty-seven patients were evaluated retrospectively considering demographic data, time course of the disease, triggering symptoms, the presence of angioedema, complementary laboratory tests including total blood count, reactive-C protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, IgE serum levels, and other, as necessary. Results: The most commonly diagnosed type of urticaria was chronic spontaneous urticaria (56.93%). Angioedema was associated with chronic urticaria in 108 patients (40.08%). Study limitations: Unicentered and retrospective. Conclusion: Some relevant findings in this study are the observation of a female prevalence of cases (4-females: 1-man), a result more elevated than demonstrated in previous studies in Europe and Asia, the median age was 43-years old and the delay of time between the diagnosis of urticaria and the admission for treatment in a specialized center was approximately 2-years. Other multicenter studies can better establish these differences in Brazilian patients.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartof An Bras Dermatol. 2021;96(4):436-41
dc.rights © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title What lessons can we learn? Clinical and epidemiological retrospective analysis of 267 patients with urticaria in a Brazilian tertiary center
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.003
dc.subject.keyword Angioedema
dc.subject.keyword Biomarkers, pharmacological
dc.subject.keyword Epidemiology
dc.subject.keyword Treatment outcome
dc.subject.keyword Urticaria
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

In collaboration with Compliant to Partaking