Welcome to the UPF Digital Repository

Participação arriscada: manifestações e tumultos em regimes ditatoriais

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Escribà-Folch, Abel
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-21T08:05:31Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-21T08:05:31Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.citation Escribà-Folch A. Participação arriscada: manifestações e tumultos em regimes ditatoriais. Dados. 2008;51(3):719-50. DOI: 10.1590/S0011-52582008000300006
dc.identifier.issn 0011-5258
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/47947
dc.description.abstract Dans cet article, on contrôle de façon empirique, tout en utilisant un large échantillon de pays, les différentes théories sur dissension et protestation au coeur des régimes autoritaires, où ces activités sont souvent traquées et forcément périlleuses. Les résultats empiriques de l'analyse comparative longitudinale confirment les prévisions de l'approche économique rationnelle à propos de la protestation politique, ainsi que le pouvoir d'explication des facteurs structuraux, de la théorie de la privation relative, des processus de diffusion politique au niveau des régions, le rôle des institutions dictatoriales et, en partie, la théorie de la mobilisation des ressources. On voit aussi que la participation non violente est l'un des principaux déterminants des émeutes et que la protestation précédente détermine de façon décisive la protestation actuelle, quelle qu'elle soit.
dc.description.abstract This article draws on a broad sample of countries to empirically test the different theories on dissent and protest in the context of authoritarian regimes, where such activities are generally repressed and are therefore risky. The empirical results of the longitudinal comparative analysis basically confirm the predictions of the rational economic approach to political protest as well as the explanatory power of structural factors, the relative deprivation theory, the political diffusion processes (at the regional level), the role of dictatorial institutions, and in part the resource mobilization theory. The empirical analysis also shows that non-violent participation is one of the main determinants of riots and that past protest is important in determining present protest (whatever its type).
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso cat
dc.publisher Instituto de Estudios Sociales y Políticos de la Universidad del Estado de Río de Janeiro
dc.relation.ispartof Dados. 2008;51(3):719-50
dc.rights This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.title Participação arriscada: manifestações e tumultos em regimes ditatoriais
dc.title.alternative Participation politique périlleuse: manifestations et troubles sous des régimes dictatoriaux
dc.title.alternative High-risk political participation: demonstrations and riots under dictatorial regimes
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582008000300006
dc.subject.keyword Political protest
dc.subject.keyword Authoritarian regimes
dc.subject.keyword Institutions
dc.subject.keyword Political participation
dc.subject.keyword Protestation politique
dc.subject.keyword Régimes autoritaires
dc.subject.keyword Institutions
dc.subject.keyword Participation politique
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

In collaboration with Compliant to Partaking