Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hinzen, Wolfram
dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-21T08:48:06Z
dc.date.available 2019-10-21T08:48:06Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Hinzen W. Is our mental grammar just a set of constructions? Commentary on Evans 2014. Language. 2017; 92(1):203-7. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0021
dc.identifier.issn 0097-8507
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/42475
dc.description.abstract According to this book, ‘each of us carries around in our heads a “mental grammar” far more impressive than any written grammar’ (6); this grammar is made up of ‘abstract rules’ that can generate a ‘seemingly infinite number of novel sentences’ (12).
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Linguistic Society of America
dc.relation.ispartof Language. 2017; 92(1):203-7. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0021
dc.rights © Linguistic Society of America
dc.subject.other Evans, Vyvyan. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct -- Ressenyes
dc.title Is our mental grammar just a set of constructions?
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0021
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Compliant to Partaking