Welcome to the UPF Digital Repository

Clinical results of diffractive, refractive, hybrid multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dyrda, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.author Martínez-Palmer, A.R.
dc.contributor.author Martı́n-Moral, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Rey, Amanda
dc.contributor.author Morilla-Grasa, Antonio
dc.contributor.author Castilla-Martí, Miguel
dc.contributor.author Aronés-Santivañez, Janny
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-05T08:23:16Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-05T08:23:16Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Dyrda A, Martínez-Palmer A, Martín-Moral D, Rey A, Morilla A, Castilla-Martí M. et al. Clinical results of diffractive, refractive, hybrid multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 25;2018:8285637. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8285637
dc.identifier.issn 2090-004X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/41702
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE: To present the outcomes of hybrid multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to compare with refractive and diffractive multifocal IOLs (MFIOLs). METHODS: Three hundred twenty eyes (160 patients) underwent cataract surgery with randomized IOLs bilateral implantation. Changes in uncorrected and distance-corrected logMAR distance, intermediate and near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), presence of dysphotopsia, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction were analyzed. RESULTS: Postoperative VA in the hybrid (OptiVis) group was improved in all distances (p < 0.001). OptiVis acted superiorly to monofocal IOLs in UNVA and DCNVA (p < 0.001 for both) and to refractive ones in DCNVA (p < 0.005). Distance, mesopic, without glare CS in OptiVis was lower than in the monofocal group and similar to other MFIOLs. No differences in dysphotopsia pre- and postoperatively and spectacle independence in near for OptiVis and refractive MFIOLs were detected. OptiVis patients were more satisfied than those with monofocal IOLs (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: After cataract surgery, patients with OptiVis improved VA in all distances. Near and intermediate VA was better than monofocal, and DCNVA was better than the refractive group. CS was lower in OptiVis than in the monofocal group, but there was no difference between MFIOLs. Patient satisfaction was higher in OptiVis than in the monofocal group. This trial is registered with NCT03512626.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Hindawi
dc.rights Copyright © 2018 Agnieszka Dyrda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.other Cataractes -- Cirurgia
dc.subject.other Ulls -- Malalties
dc.title Clinical results of diffractive, refractive, hybrid multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8285637
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Compliant to Partaking