Welcome to the UPF Digital Repository

Report of the results of an IMS Learning Design Expert Workshop

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Neumann, S.
dc.contributor.author Klebl, M.
dc.contributor.author Griffiths Jenkins, David
dc.contributor.author Hernández Leo, Davinia
dc.contributor.author de la Fuente Valentín, L.
dc.contributor.author Hummel, H.
dc.contributor.author Brouns, F.
dc.contributor.author Derntl, Michael
dc.contributor.author Oberhuemer, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-08T12:01:48Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-08T12:01:48Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Neumann S, Klebl M, Griffiths D, Hernández-Leo D, de la Fuente Valentín L, Hummel H, Brouns F, Derntl M, Oberhuemer P. Report of the results of an IMS Learning Design Expert Workshop. Int J Tech Learn. 2010:5(1):58-72. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v5i1.1045
dc.identifier.issn 1863-0383
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/36219
dc.description En col·laboració amb: T Boyle, M Dicerto, N Faltin, A Wasim
dc.description.abstract Europe has seen a number of learning design initiatives in the past years. Among them are the Open University UK Learning Design Initiative, JISC’s Design for Learning Programme, as well as the Open University of the Netherlands’ development of the Educational Modelling Language and its conversion into the specification IMS Learning Design. Particularly the last initiative inspired an IMS Learning Design Expert Workshop, which was held at the University of Vienna on November 20 & 21, 2008. This report contains a description of the purpose of the workshop, its methodologies and the results. Participating experts first brainstormed visions and problems of IMS Learning Design, and then developed potential solutions to some of the identified problems. Three groups formed to work on two of the identified problems in more depth: the usability and utility problem, and the life cycle of a unit of learning. The proposed solutions regarding the usability and utility problem were to investigate how teachers’ and learners’ representations of a learning design can be brought together, and to set up a research program to identify how teachers cognitively proceed when designing courses, and to map this knowledge to IMS LD. In regard to the life cycle of a unit of learning problem, the group suggested a system that continually exchanges information between runtime and editing systems so that units of learning can be updated accordingly.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher International Association of Online Engineering
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2010:5(1):58-72.
dc.rights ©2017 Susanne Neumann, Michael Klebl, Dai Griffiths, Davinia Hernández-Leo, Luis de la Fuente Valentín, Hans Hummel, Francis Brouns, Michael Derntl, Petra Oberhuemer
dc.title Report of the results of an IMS Learning Design Expert Workshop
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v5i1.1045
dc.subject.keyword IMS Learning Design
dc.subject.keyword Future
dc.subject.keyword Problem
dc.subject.keyword Solution
dc.subject.keyword Vision
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Compliant to Partaking