I propose a dynamic general equilibrium model in which strategic interactions between
banks and depositors may lead to endogenous bank fragility and slow recovery from
crises. When banks’ investment decisions are not contractible, depositors form
expectations about bank risk-taking and demand a return on deposits according to their
risk. This creates strategic complementarities and possibly multiple equilibria: in response
to an increase in funding costs, banks may optimally choose to pursue ...
I propose a dynamic general equilibrium model in which strategic interactions between
banks and depositors may lead to endogenous bank fragility and slow recovery from
crises. When banks’ investment decisions are not contractible, depositors form
expectations about bank risk-taking and demand a return on deposits according to their
risk. This creates strategic complementarities and possibly multiple equilibria: in response
to an increase in funding costs, banks may optimally choose to pursue risky portfolios
that undermine their solvency prospects. In a bad equilibrium, high funding costs hinder
the accumulation of bank net worth, leading to a persistent drop in investment and output.
I bring the model to bear on the European sovereign debt crisis, in the course of which
under-capitalized banks in default-risky countries experienced an increase in funding
costs and raised their holdings of domestic government debt. The model is quantified
using Portuguese data and accounts for macroeconomic dynamics in Portugal in 2010-
2016. Policy interventions face a trade-o¤ between alleviating banks’ funding conditions
and strengthening risk-taking incentives. Liquidity provision to banks may eliminate the
good equilibrium when not targeted. Targeted interventions have the capacity to eliminate
adverse equilibria.
+