Despite intense scrutiny, estimates of the government spending multiplier remain highly
uncertain, with values ranging from 0.5 to 2. While an increase in government spending
is generally assumed to have the same (mirror-image) effect as a decrease in government
spending, we show that relaxing this assumption is important to understand the effects
of fiscal policy. Regardless of whether we identify government spending shocks from (i) a
narrative approach, or (ii) a timing restriction, we find that ...
Despite intense scrutiny, estimates of the government spending multiplier remain highly
uncertain, with values ranging from 0.5 to 2. While an increase in government spending
is generally assumed to have the same (mirror-image) effect as a decrease in government
spending, we show that relaxing this assumption is important to understand the effects
of fiscal policy. Regardless of whether we identify government spending shocks from (i) a
narrative approach, or (ii) a timing restriction, we find that the contractionary multiplier
-the multiplier associated with a negative shock to government spending- is above 1, while
the expansionary multiplier -the multiplier associated with a positive shock- is substantially
below 1. The multiplier is largest in recessions, as found in previous studies, but only
because the contractionary multiplier is largest in recessions. The expansionary multiplier
is always below 1 and not larger in recessions. We argue that our results help understand
the wide range of multiplier estimates found in the literature.
+