Welcome to the UPF Digital Repository

Performance of low-cost monitors to assess household air pollution

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Curto Tirado, Ariadna, 1987-
dc.contributor.author Donaire González, David
dc.contributor.author Barrera Gómez, Jose
dc.contributor.author Marshall, Julian D.
dc.contributor.author Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
dc.contributor.author Wellenius, Gregory A.
dc.contributor.author Tonne, Cathryn
dc.date.accessioned 2018-02-14T10:41:26Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Curto A, Donaire-Gonzalez D, Barrera-Gómez J, Marshall JD, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Wellenius GA, Tonne C. Performance of low-cost monitors to assess household air pollution. Environ Res. 2018;163:53-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.024
dc.identifier.issn 0013-9351
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/33850
dc.description.abstract Exposure to household air pollution is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. However, due to the lack of validated low-cost monitors with long-lasting batteries in indoor environments, most epidemiologic studies use self-reported data or short-term household air pollution assessments as proxies of long-term exposure. We evaluated the performance of three low-cost monitors measuring fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide (CO) in a wood-combustion experiment conducted in one household of Spain for 5 days (including the co-location of 2 units of HAPEX and 3 units of TZOA-R for PM2.5 and 3 units of EL-USB-CO for CO; a total of 40 unit-days). We used Spearman correlation (ρ) and Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) to assess accuracy of low-cost monitors versus equivalent research-grade devices. We also conducted a field study in India for 1 week (including HAPEX in 3 households and EL-USB-CO in 4 households; a total of 49 unit-days). Correlation and agreement at 5-min were moderate-high for one unit of HAPEX (ρ = 0.73 / CCC = 0.59), for one unit of TZOA-R (ρ = 0.89 / CCC = 0.62) and for three units of EL-USB-CO (ρ = 0.82–0.89 / CCC = 0.66–0.91) in Spain, although the failure or malfunction rate among low-cost units was high in both settings (60% of unit-days in Spain and 43% in India). Low-cost monitors tested here are not yet ready to replace more established exposure assessment methods in long-term household air pollution epidemiologic studies. More field validation is needed to assess evolving sensors and monitors with application to health studies.
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the Brown India Initiative of Brown University and the European Research Council under ERC Grant Agreement number 336167 for the CHAI Project. ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya. CT was funded through a Ramón y Cajal fellowship (RYC-2015–17402) awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartof Environmental Research. 2018;163:53-63
dc.relation.isreferencedby http://hdl.handle.net/10230/28201
dc.rights © Elsevier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.024
dc.title Performance of low-cost monitors to assess household air pollution
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.024
dc.subject.keyword Household air pollution
dc.subject.keyword Particulate matter
dc.subject.keyword Carbon monoxide
dc.subject.keyword Air quality sensing
dc.subject.keyword Low cost instrument
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/336167
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account


In collaboration with Compliant to Partaking