UPF Digital Repository
Guides
Recent Submissions
Este informe, enmarcado en el Objetivo de monitorización de la ciencia abierta de la Línea 2 de REBIUN para el 2025, presenta la Medición del Acceso Abierto en las universidades españolas y en el CSIC del periodo 2020-2024. Los datos del período 2020-2024 indican que la publicación en acceso abierto en España está claramente consolidada, oscilando de forma sostenida en un rango del 70–80 %. En 2024, el porcentaje alcanzó el 75,6 %, un valor alineado con los años precedentes, aunque ligeramente inferior al máximo de 2022 con un 81%. Al igual que en resultados anteriores, esta tendencia se ve impulsada por diversos factores: el marco legislativo y las políticas de fomento de la Ciencia Abierta, los acuerdos transformativos CRUE-CSIC iniciados en 2021, y los firmados por universidades o consorcios con otras editoriales. Asimismo, los nuevos criterios de las agencias de financiación introducidos en 2023 están reforzando positivamente esta evolución. Como en el estudio anterior (2024), se usan los datos extraídos de OpenAlex a partir del identificador de cada universidad y de los centros del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). En esta edición se ha empleado la versión Walden, operativa desde principios de noviembre de 2025, que ofrece un volumen de resultados muy superior y una mayor frecuencia de actualización. De acuerdo con la tendencia de años anteriores y los datos referentes al periodo 2020-2024 puede decirse que el acceso abierto a las publicaciones resultado de la investigación de las universidades y CSIC está claramente consolidado. Todos los conjuntos de datos (datasets) y código están disponibles en acceso abierto en el repositorio e-cienciaDatos en la siguiente URI: https://doi.org/10.21950/SDYKFX
(2026) Amigot, Ana; Bonora, Laura; Calzas, Isabel; Casaldàliga Riera, Anna; Losada Yáñez, Marina; Melero, Reme; Moreno, Alexis; Ortiz Uceta, Eva; Pallarès, Jordi; Ribes, Inma; Rovira Fernàndez, Anna; Santanach López, Bruna (2026) Corbella, Joan M
(2026) José i Solsona, Carles
International studies measuring wellbeing/multidimensional mental health before/ during the COVID-19 pandemic, including representative samples for >2 years, identifying risk groups and coping strategies are lacking. COH-FIT is an online, international, anonymous survey measuring changes in well-being (WHO-5) and a composite psychopathology P-score, and their associations with COVID-19 deaths/restrictions, 12 a-priori defined risk individual/cumulative factors, and coping strategies during COVID-19 pandemic (26/04/2020-26/06/2022) in 30 languages (representative, weighted non-representative, adults). T-test, χ2, penalized cubic splines, linear regression, correlation analyses were conducted. Analyzing 121,066/142,364 initiated surveys, WHO-5/P-score worsened intra-pandemic by 11.1±21.1/13.2±17.9 points (effect size d=0.50/0.60) (comparable results in representative/weighted non-probability samples). Persons with WHO-5 scores indicative of depression screening (<50, 13% to 32%) and major depression (<29, 3% to 12%) significantly increased. WHO-5 worsened from those with mental disorders, female sex, COVID-19-related loss, low-income country location, physical disorders, healthcare worker occupations, large city location, COVID-19 infection, unemployment, first-generation immigration, to age=18-29 with a cumulative effect. Similar findings emerged for P-score. Changes were significantly but minimally related to COVID-19 deaths, returning to near-pre-pandemic values after >2 years. The most subjectively effective coping strategies were exercise and walking, internet use, social contacts. Identified risk groups, coping strategies and outcome trajectories can inform global public health strategies.
(2024) Solmi, Marco; Guinart, Daniel; Correll, Christoph U.Purpose: We aimed to describe the intensity of care and its consequences on informal caregivers of stroke survivors according to the degree of care receivers' functional dependence for activities of daily living; and to identify the factors associated with caregivers' care-related quality of life. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of prospective data collected in a cost-utility study alongside the RACECAT trial in Catalonia (Spain). One-hundred and thirty-two care receiver-caregiver pairs were interviewed six months after stroke. Functional dependence for activities of daily living was measured with the Barthel index. We assessed caregivers care-related quality of life with the CarerQoL, which measures seven dimensions of subjective burden (CarerQoL-7D) and a happiness score (CarerQoL-VAS). We evaluated the association between characteristics of informal caregivers, characteristics of care receivers, and intensity of care, and the caregiver's care-related quality of life (subjective burden and happiness) in a hypothesized model using a structural equation model. Results: Of the 132 caregivers, 74,2% were women with an average age of 59.4 ± 12.5 years. The 56.8% of them were spouses. The care intensity ranged from a mean of 24h/week for mild to 40h/week for severe dependence. Most caregivers (76.3%) were satisfied with their task, regardless of dependence, but showed increasing problems in caring for severely dependent persons. Being a woman (coeff. -0.23; 95%CI: -0.40, -0.07), spending more time in care tasks (coeff -0.37; -0.53, -0.21) and care receiver need of constant supervision (coeff 0.31; -0.47, -0.14) were associated with higher burden of care, irrespective of the degree of dependence. Caregiver burden (coeff 0.46; 0.30-0.61) and care receiver anxiety or depression (coeff -0.19; -0.34, -0.03) were associated with lower caregiver happiness. Conclusions: The findings suggest the importance of developing mainly two types of support interventions for caregivers: respite and psychosocial support. Especially for women with high caring burden and/or caring for persons with high levels of anxiety or depression.
(2024) Villa García, Lorena; Salvat, Mercè; Slof, John; Pérez de la Ossa, Natalia; Abilleira, Sonia; Ribó, Marc; Hidalgo Benítez, Verónica; Inzitari, Marco; Ribera, Aida